TSTP Solution File: ITP270^1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : ITP270^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Z3B7gRe82e true

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:24:05 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 144.07s 19.07s
% Output   : Refutation 144.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   7 unt;  12 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   57 (   4   ~;   2   |;   1   &;  48   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   8   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0   ^;   6   !;   0   ?;   6   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(nat_type,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(num_type,type,
    num: $tType ).

thf(x_type,type,
    x: nat ).

thf(mi_type,type,
    mi: nat ).

thf(ord_less_eq_nat_type,type,
    ord_less_eq_nat: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(ord_less_nat_type,type,
    ord_less_nat: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(bit0_type,type,
    bit0: num > num ).

thf(deg_type,type,
    deg: nat ).

thf(ma_type,type,
    ma: nat ).

thf(one_type,type,
    one: num ).

thf(numeral_numeral_nat_type,type,
    numeral_numeral_nat: num > nat ).

thf(power_power_nat_type,type,
    power_power_nat: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(fact_1__C5_Ohyps_C_I8_J,axiom,
    ord_less_nat @ ma @ ( power_power_nat @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) @ deg ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
    ord_less_nat @ ma @ ( power_power_nat @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) @ deg ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_1__C5_Ohyps_C_I8_J]) ).

thf(conj_0,conjecture,
    ord_less_nat @ x @ ( power_power_nat @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) @ deg ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_nat @ x @ ( power_power_nat @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) @ deg ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[conj_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl8514,plain,
    ~ ( ord_less_nat @ x @ ( power_power_nat @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) @ deg ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(fact_24__092_060open_062x_A_092_060le_062_Ama_A_092_060and_062_Ami_A_092_060le_062_Ax_092_060close_062,axiom,
    ( ( ord_less_eq_nat @ mi @ x )
    & ( ord_less_eq_nat @ x @ ma ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl25,plain,
    ord_less_eq_nat @ x @ ma,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_24__092_060open_062x_A_092_060le_062_Ama_A_092_060and_062_Ami_A_092_060le_062_Ax_092_060close_062]) ).

thf(fact_608_dual__order_Ostrict__trans2,axiom,
    ! [B: nat,A: nat,C: nat] :
      ( ( ord_less_nat @ B @ A )
     => ( ( ord_less_eq_nat @ C @ B )
       => ( ord_less_nat @ C @ A ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl857,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X0 @ X1 )
      | ( ord_less_nat @ X2 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( ord_less_eq_nat @ X2 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_608_dual__order_Ostrict__trans2]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl33031,plain,
    $false,
    inference(eprover,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1,zip_derived_cl8514,zip_derived_cl25,zip_derived_cl857]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : ITP270^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Z3B7gRe82e true
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 12:59:02 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.36  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.36  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.36  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.37  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.37  % Running in HO mode
% 0.22/0.69  % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.22/0.69  % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.22/0.69  % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.98/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 0.98/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 0.98/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 0.98/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 0.98/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 0.98/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 0.98/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 0.98/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s
% 1.45/1.32  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_b.l.sh running for 90s
% 144.07/19.07  % Solved by lams/40_c.s.sh.
% 144.07/19.07  % done 2875 iterations in 18.289s
% 144.07/19.07  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 144.07/19.07  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 144.07/19.07  
% 144.07/19.07  
% 144.07/19.07  % Terminating...
% 144.07/19.12  % Runner terminated.
% 144.07/19.12  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------